Linking Item Analysis to Teaching and Learning: What English Test Data Tell Us about Teachers’ Competencies
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3116Keywords:
item analysis; teacher competence; classical test theory; assessment literacy; English language educationAbstract
This study examines the psychometric qualities of a tryout test administered to 283 in-service English teachers in Indonesia, using Classical Test Theory (CTT) procedures. The analysis focused on five indices: item validity, discrimination, difficulty, distractor functioning, and item utilization. Results revealed several weaknesses in the test design. Only 46% of items demonstrated acceptable validity, while 54% failed to align meaningfully with the overall construct of teacher competence. More than half of the items showed poor discrimination, limiting the test’s ability to differentiate high- and low-performing teachers. Difficulty levels were skewed, with 72% of items categorized as easy, thereby restricting the measurement of higher-order thinking skills. Distractor analysis indicated that three-quarters of options were non-functioning, reducing diagnostic value. Consequently, only 9% of items could be retained without revision. Despite these shortcomings, the findings provide useful insights into teacher competencies. While basic linguistic and pedagogical knowledge was well represented, higher-order professional skills such as inference, synthesis, and applied pedagogy were under-assessed. These results highlight the importance of strengthening assessment literacy and integrating item analysis into teacher professional development.
References
Bachman, L. (2022). Language Assessment for Classroom Teachers. Oxford University Press.
Bennett, R. E. (2017). Advancing human assessment: The methodological, psychological and policy contributions of ETS. In Methodology of educational measurement and assessment. http://uml.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/2008438806?accountid=14569%0Ahttp://primo-pmtna01.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/UMB/01UMB_INST/umb_services_page??url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&genre=book
Brown, H. D. (2019). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education.
Brown, T. D., Barnes, M., & Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2024). Teacher perspectives and experiences of assessment literacy in Victorian junior secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 68(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231214022
Ebel, R. L., & Friesbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurem. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1–370. https://ebookppsunp.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/robert_l-ebel_david_a-_frisbie_essentials_of_edbookfi-org.pdf
Estaji, M. (2024). Perceived need for a teacher education course on assessment literacy development: insights from EAP instructors. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00272-2
Fulcher, G., & Harding, L. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. In The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003220756
Haladyna, T. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2013). Developing and Validating Test Items. Routledge.
Hartati, N. (2024). Item analysis of pre-service EFL teachers’ formative test in teaching practicum for program evaluation. LingTera, 11(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v11i2.67170
Hrich, N., Azekri, M., & Khaldi, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Item Analysis Tool for Educational Assessment: Case of Large-Scale Competitive Exams. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(6), 822–827. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.6.2107
Karim, S. A., Sudiro, S., & Sakinah, S. (2021). Utilizing test items analysis to examine the level of difficulty and discriminating power in a teacher-made test. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.6.2.256-269
Kusanagi, K. N. (2022). Importing and Exporting Lesson Study. In Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Vol. 69). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5928-8_3
Lestari, S., & Yusuf, F. N. (2025). Aligning Assessment Practices with Learning Objectives: A Case of EFL Classes in Indonesia. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 10(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1973
Maharani, A. V., & Putro, N. H. P. S. (2020). Item Analysis of English Final Semester Test. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 491. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i2.302
Rejeki, S., Bayu, A., Sari, P., Iswahyuni, D., Yogyanti, D. W., Sutanto, S., & Anggia, H. (2023). Discrimination index, difficulty index, and distractor efficiency in MCQs English for academic purposes midterm test. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Journal of English Language and Pedagogy Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(1), 1–11.
Rezkilaturahmi, Istiqlal, M., Pancoro Setyo Putro, N. H., Istiyono, E., & Widihastuti. (2025). Evaluating English Language Test Items Developed by Teachers: An Item Response Theory Approach. Voices of English Language Education Society, 9(1), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v9i1.27644
Rohmatdi, A., Martono, M., Zafrullah, Z., & Safitri, R. (2024). Optimizing Question Quality in Junior High School Exams: Classical Test Theory Evaluation with ITEMAN 4.3. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 4363–4375. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5671
Sathasivam, R. V., Samuel, M., Nor, N. M., Tee, M. Y., & Leong, K. E. (2023). Assessment for learning: Espoused and enacted practices of Malaysian teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27(T2), 47–62.
Semiun, T. T., Wisrance, M. W., & Napitupulu, M. H. (2022). English Summative Test: The Quality of Its Items. English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i2.18347
Sugianto, A. (2020). Item analysis of English summative test: EFL teacher-made test. Indonesian EFL Research and Practices, 1(1), 35–54. https://journal.iaima.ac.id/i-efl/article/view/4
Thompson, N. A., & Ph, D. (2016). Thompson_2016_Classical_Test_Theory_with_CITAS.
Thu Thuy, N. T. (2023). Vietnamese High School Students’ Perceptions And Practices Of Metacognitive Reading Strategies: A Case Study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(6), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.06.2023.p13814
Varier, D., Powell, M. G., Dodman, S., Ives, S. T., DeMulder, E., & View, J. L. (2024). Use and Usefulness of Assessments to Inform Instruction: Developing a K-12 Classroom Teacher Assessment Practice Measure. Educational Assessment, 29(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2024.2316907
Wallace, M. P., & Ke, H. (2023). Examining the Content Alignment Between Language Curriculum and a Language Test in China. Teflin Journal, 34(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/116-135
Yongqi Gu, P., & Lam, R. (2023). Developing Assessment Literacy for Classroom-Based Formative Assessment. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2023-0201
Yu, C., & Xu, W. (2024). Writing assessment literacy and its impact on the learning of writing: A netnography focusing on Duolingo English Test examinees. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00297-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suharyadi, Shirly Rizki Kusumaningrum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












