Analysis of Sema No. 2/2023 on Interfaith Marriage Registration Under UU Adminduk Analisis Sema Nomor 2 tahun 2023 terhadap Pencatatan Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut UU Adminduk
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v2i4.4128Keywords:
Interfaith Marriage, Marriage Registration, Population Administration, SEMA No. 2 of 2023Abstract
Interfaith marriage remains a complex legal issue in Indonesia, especially regarding its registration under population administration law. Despite constitutional guarantees of religious freedom, interfaith couples face legal uncertainty due to normative disharmony and legislative gaps. The issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023 prohibits judges from granting court decisions for registering interfaith marriages, previously seen as a legal alternative. This study employs a normative juridical method with descriptive-analytical specifications using library research. The findings show that SEMA No. 2 of 2023 restricts interpretations of Articles 35(a) and 36(1) of Law No. 24 of 2013, limiting administrative access and creating legal uncertainty. Although SEMA lacks formal legal hierarchy, its impact is significant. The persistence of interfaith marriages reflects a disconnect between constitutional rights and rigid legal norms. Thus, regulatory reform is urgently needed to align interfaith marriage registration with constitutional principles and administrative justice
References
Ali, M. D. (2002). Hukum Islam: Pengantar ilmu hukum dan tata hukum Islam di Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Arief, B. N. (2018). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana. Prenada Media.
Atmadja, I. D. G. (2012). Teori hukum dan teori perundang-undangan. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.
Fajar, M., & Ahmad, Y. (2013). Dualitas penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Fakhriah, E. L. (2019). Kebijakan hukum pencatatan perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia. PT Alumni.
Hadjon, P. M. (2005). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Kedudukan, fungsi, dan wewenang Mahkamah Agung. Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Kedudukan hukum perdata dalam sistem hukum nasional.
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Indrati, M. F. (2011). Ilmu perundang-undangan: Jenis, fungsi, dan materi muatan. Kanisius.
Indrati, M. F. (2015). Perkembangan hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. FH UGM Press.
Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press.
Mamudji, S. (2008). Hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. Rajawali Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mulyadi, L. (2010). Hukum perkawinan dan perlindungan hak anak. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nawiasky, H. (1956). Allgemeine Rechtslehre.
(Catatan: Penerbit tidak dicantumkan.)
Palguna, I. D. G. (2017). Pluralisme hukum dan perlindungan HAM dalam perkawinan.
(Catatan: Penerbit tidak dicantumkan.)
Radbruch, G. (1948). Rechtsphilosophie. C. F. Müller.
Ridwan, H. R. (2010). Hukum administrasi negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Rofiqoh, E. (2024). Implementasi dan dampak pencatatan perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia pasca Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Sholikin, M. N. (2020). Hukum perkawinan di Indonesia: Perspektif hak asasi manusia. Kencana.
Soekanto, S. (2008). Pokok-pokok sosiologi hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Soemitro, R. H. (1988). Metode penelitian hukum dan jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
Subekti, R. (2008). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Intermasa.
Subekti. (2008). Hukum perkawinan. Intermasa.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review.
Yustina, M. (2020). Hukum perkawinan di Indonesia.
(Catatan: Penerbit tidak dicantumkan.)
Zainudin, A. (2011). Metode penelitian hukum (Cetakan ketiga). Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Enzellita Meliyani Sutisna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
