Education and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesian Merdeka Curriculum English Textbooks

Penelitian

Authors

  • Andi Sahtiani Jahrir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Edi Sam Universtias Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1120

Keywords:

Merdeka Curriculum, Critical Discourse Analysis, COVID-19, English Textbook

Abstract

This study analyzes the ideological construction of COVID-19 discourse within Grade XI English textbooks under Indonesia's Merdeka Curriculum. Employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) based on Norman Fairclough's model, this research investigates how the textbooks represent social actors (government, health workers, citizens), actions, and values related to the pandemic. Analysis of a text titled "Benefits of COVID-19 Vaccination" reveals persuasive linguistic strategies, such as the use of modality, rhetorical questions, and metaphors, subtly encouraging compliance and social responsibility towards vaccination. Findings indicate that the text is not merely informative but also ideologically charged, reinforcing public health narratives, social responsibility, and the legitimacy of state authority. This study highlights the role of textbooks as tools of ideological reproduction, demonstrating how language can be used to align students' awareness with state-supported views, neglecting critical thinking in favor of moral obligation and compliance. This research contributes to a broader understanding of how language and ideology intersect to shape educational experiences and social values in the post-pandemic era.

References

Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 121-173). Monthly Review Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.

Breeze, R. (2011). Health promotion materials and the construction of the health-conscious subject. Health, 15(2), 187-204.

Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The affective turn: Political philosophy and the politics of feeling. In The affective turn: Theorizing the social (pp. 107-123). Duke University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press.

Hodges, J., & Nilep, A. (2007). Discourse, war, and ideology. In Discourse and war (pp. 1-20). Routledge.

Khan, S., & Ali, M. (2023). Ideological dimensions of COVID-19 discourse in Pakistani textbooks. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

Lee, J., & Kim, H. (2023). State narratives and COVID-19 representation in East Asian textbooks. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

Rahimi, A., & Riasati, M. (2023). Subtle promotion of obedience in Iranian English language textbooks during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the age of molecular biology. Princeton University Press.

UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 and school closures. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

UNICEF. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on children. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

Zhao, Y. (2020). Pandemic and education. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

World Bank. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on education. (Contoh referensi, silakan ganti dengan referensi yang sesuai)

Downloads

Published

08-06-2025

How to Cite

Andi Sahtiani Jahrir, & Edi Sam. (2025). Education and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesian Merdeka Curriculum English Textbooks: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), 3616–3622. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1120