Standarisasi Manajemen Risiko ISO 31000: Tantangan dan Strategi Implementasi pada PT. Telkom Indonesia

Penelitian

Authors

  • Afrila Mulyati Siregar Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Kariono Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Ade Rani Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Dara Yuliani Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Natalin Pepayosa Sembiring Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Chika Naibaho Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Febri Sabrina Hasibuan Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Istiqomah Putri Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1564

Keywords:

Social Media Marketing, Brand Awareness, Engagement Rate, Instagram Insight

Abstract

This study analyzes the challenges and strategies for implementing ISO 31000: 2018 Risk Management standardization in PT. Telkom Indonesia. It is characterized by globalization that supports the advancement of information and Communication Technology in the field of telecommunications industry. PT. Telkom Indonesia as one of the major players in this industry, is required to be able to effectively manage risks in order to ensure the continuity of operations and services to customers.  Standardized risk management is an important aspect that can help companies in identifying, analyzing, and addressing potential risks that can interfere with business performance. Using the literature review method, this study identifies inhibiting factors such as operational complexity, administrative burden, and dependence on IT infrastructure. The results showed that PT. We have adopted ISO 31000: 2018 through policy updates, risks faced, employee training, and ERM application development. This has a positive impact such as reducing GHG emissions, increasing customer satisfaction, and fulfilling corporate governance. However, issues such as security risks and costs must still be considered. The study provides recommendations and suggestions to reduce risks and strengthen system integration in order to achieve business sustainability.

References

Arta, I. P. S. (2021). Manajemen Risiko Tinjauan Teori dan Praktis.

Bachtiar, R. D. B., & Machmudin Eka Prasetya. (2024). Evaluation of Risk Management Implementation in IT Projects Using ISO 31000 in an ICT Solutions Company. Accounting and Finance Studies, 4(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.47153/afs41.8682024

Dewi, L., & Kitri, M. L. (2020). Operational Risk Analysis in Department of Enterprise Risk Management of PT. XYZ Based on ISO 31000: 2018 Framework. 136(Ambec 2019), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200415.007

Diouf, A. A. (2020). Assesing oil spill management in Senegal using the ISO 31000: 2018 standard as a risk management framework.

Dr. Siti Jahroh, Q. (2021). Kerangka Manajemen Resiko. https://irmapa.org/kerangka-kerja-manajemen-risiko/

Driantami, H. T. I., Suprapto, & Perdanakusuma, A. R. (2018). Analisis Risiko Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan ISO 31000 ( Studi kasus : Sistem Penjualan PT Matahari Department Store Cabang Malang Town Square ). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(11), 4991–4998.

Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C.-Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006

Harahap, N. S. (2014). Manajemen Risiko Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework ISO 31000 (Studi Kasus: Sistem Infrastruktur TI Telkom Indonesia). Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Industri, 9(1), 52–66. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/sitekin/article/view/607

Kurnia, T., & Parahyangan, U. K. (2017). KEPEMIMPINAN – “MODEL THE WAY” INSPIRASI BAGI TERWUJUDNYA BUDAYA RISIKO PERUSAHAAN: STUDI KASUS PADA PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (Persero) Tbk. KEPEMIMPINAN – “MODEL THE WAY” INSPIRASI BAGI TERWUJUDNYA BUDAYA RISIKO PERUSAHAAN: STUDI KASUS PADA PT. TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA (Persero) Tbk, 21(2), 79–92.

Liko Ivander, D., & Papilaya, F. S. (2023). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework ISO 31000:2018. Kajian Ilmiah Informatika Dan Komputer, 4(2), 1042–1051. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i2.1174

Logar, E. (2023). Sustainable Transformation. 111–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0491-0_15

Nadhira, S. R., & Rustono, A. (2018). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus Pada Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia Witel Jakarta Selatan Unit Hr&Cdc Dan Nertwork Area). EProceeding of Management, 5(1), 260–267. https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/management/article/view/6357

Nasional, P. P., Percepatan, M., Perluasan, D. A. N., Nasional, M. P., Kompetensi, M. P., Daya, S., & Jagung, P. (2011). Laporan Tahunan Laporan Tahunan. 1–91.

Nuryakin, R. A. (2025). Kebijakan Manajemen Resiko (p. 90).

Official, T. (n.d.). Kebijakan Manajemen Resiko. Retrieved March 22, 2025, from https://www.telkom.co.id/sites/profil-telkom/id_ID/page/kebijakan-manajemen-risiko-86

Pamungkas, A. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Enterprise Risk Management (COSO) Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Akuntasi, 11(1), 12–21.

Pearce II, A. John, Robinson, R. B. (2011). Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation and Control. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Profil Telkom. (n.d.). Telkom Official. Retrieved March 21, 2025, from https://www.telkom.co.id/sites/profil-telkom/id_ID/page/profil-dan-riwayat-singkat-22

Putra, L. F., & Profita, A. (2022). Analisis Risiko Website Telkom Emas Data Validation Menggunakan Iso 31000. PROFISIENSI: Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Industri, 10(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.33373/profis.v10i2.4725

Rampini, G. H. S., Takia, H., & Berssaneti, F. T. (2019). Critical success factors of risk management with the advent of ISO 31000 2018 - Descriptive and content analyzes. Procedia Manufacturing, 39, 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.400

Renn, O. (2010). RISK PERCEPTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT : A REVIEW. Policy, January 2010, 1–9.

Rilyani, A. N., Firdaus, Y., & Jatmiko, D. D. (2015). Analisis Risiko Teknologi Informasi Berbasis Risk Management Menggunakan ISO 31000. E-Proceeding of Engineering, 2(2), 6201–6208. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/files/102538/jurnal_eproc/analisis-risiko-teknologi-informasi-berbasis-risk-management-menggunakan-iso-31000-studi-kasus-i-gracias-telkom-university.pdf

Safaat, N. (2012). Analisis Proses Manajemen Risiko Teknologi Informasi Sistem Infrastruktur Telekomunikasi (InfraTel) PT. Telkom Indonesia menggunakan Framework ISO 31000:2009. 203–211.

Suardi, S., & Azmi, F. (2022). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pada Biaya Sumbangan Pembinaan Pendidikan (Spp) Lembaga Pendidikan Dalam Upaya Mempertahankan Mutu Pendidikan. Warta Dharmawangsa, 16(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v16i3.2223

T.L. Wheelen, & J. D. H. (2012). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Toward Global Sustainability (13th ed).

Tuginem, H. N. (2023). Penelitian Strategi Pengembangan Koleksi Di Perpustakaan Pada Google Scholar: Sebuah Narrative Literature Review. Jurnal Pustaka Budaya, 10(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.31849/pb.v10i1.11275

Viozzy. (2023). Finnet Terapkan ISO 31000: Perkuat Manajemen Risiko untuk Jaga Mutu Perusahaan. MerdekaNews.Co.

Visi dan Misi. (n.d.). Telkom Official. Retrieved March 21, 2025, from https://eppid.telkom.co.id/sites/eppid/id_ID/page/visi-dan-misi-1005

Wiryono, S. K., & Suharto. (2008). Analisis Resiko PT Telekomunikasi. 7(1).

Yusran, M., Hadijah, S., & Ilham, B. U. (2025). Anticipatory Risk Planning at PT Telkom Indonesia. 4(1), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijec.v4i1.1221

Zagoto, S. P., & Sitokdana, M. N. N. (2021). Analisis Risiko Teknologi Informasi di Organisasi XYZ Cabang Salatiga Menggunakan ISO 31000. Jurnal MNEMONIC, 4(1), 1–9.

Downloads

Published

12-07-2025

How to Cite

Afrila Mulyati Siregar, Kariono, Ade Rani, Dara Yuliani, Natalin Pepayosa Sembiring, Chika Naibaho, Febri Sabrina Hasibuan, & Istiqomah Putri. (2025). Standarisasi Manajemen Risiko ISO 31000: Tantangan dan Strategi Implementasi pada PT. Telkom Indonesia: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1), 1140–1151. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1564