Teknologi Pendidikan sebagai Arena Etika: Mediasi Nilai oleh Mahasiswa dalam Perspektif Kritis Andrew Feenberg
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1850Keywords:
Teknologi Pendidikan, Mediasi nilai, Etika Teknologi, Andrew FeenbergAbstract
This article explores the role of students in mediating values through the use of educational technology, employing a qualitative approach grounded in a literature-based study of the critical philosophy of technology developed by Andrew Feenberg. The focus of this study is on students' activities in creating digital media such as instructional videos that reflect ethical dimensions within digital learning spaces. Data were obtained through a literature review of both primary and secondary sources, including the works of Feenberg, Bayne, Selwyn, and Nkomo et al. The analysis reveals that students have the potential to act as agents of value construction through the process of democratic rationalization, in which educational technology initially neutral and technical acquires new meaning through its practical use. The study identifies a gap in educational technology research, which tends to emphasize effectiveness over ethical considerations. These findings underscore the importance of viewing educational technology not merely as a technical instrument but as an ethical space that shapes the relationship between users and values. This article offers a conceptual contribution to the field of educational technology by positioning students as reflective subjects within the ethical configuration of technology.
References
Akcay, B. (2008). The Relationship Between Technology And Ethics; From Society to Schools. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(4), 120–127.
Bayne, S. (2015). What’s The Matter With ‘Technology-Enhanced Learning’? Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851
de Boer, B., Hoek, J., & Kudina, O. (2018). Can the technological mediation approach improve technology assessment? A critical view from ‘within’*. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1495029
Doppelt, G. (2001). What Sort Of Ethics Does Technology Require? Journal of Ethics, 5(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011956206973
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296706069
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming Technology A Critical Theory Revisited.
Feenberg, A. (2004). Democratic Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Freedom. Readings in the Philosophy of TechnologyReadings in the Philosophy of Technology, 583. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=F9Ht2_yf6zwC&pgis=1
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem : the social life of reason. Harvard University Press.
Gardelli, V., Alerby, E., & Persson, A. (2014). Why Philosophical Ethics in School: Implications for Education in Technology And in General. Ethics and Education, 9(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2014.890277
Isakov, O. (2025). The Educational Technology of Ethical Development for Students. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 5(4), 92–94. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/volume05issue04-19
Kudina, O. (2025). Technological Mediation of Morality. In Moral Hermeneutics and Technology. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216270317.ch-002
Marin, L., & Steinert, S. (2022). Twisted Thinking: Technology, Values and Critical Thinking. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 38(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0124
Nkomo, L. M., Daniel, B. K., & Butson, R. J. (2021). Synthesis Of Student Engagement with Digital Technologies: a Systematic Review Of The Literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00270-1
Parsons, T. D. (2021). Ethics and Educational Technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09846-6
Selwyn, N. (2012). Ten Suggestions For Improving Academic Research In Education And Technology. In Learning, Media and Technology (Vol. 37, Issue 3, pp. 213–219). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.680213
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nida Hanifa, Adinuringtyas Herfi Rahmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












