Evaluasi dan Penguatan Organizational Resilience di Perguruan Tinggi Vokasi: Pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dalam Menjawab Tantangan Institusional: Penelitian

Nika Sintesa Grinika; Rais Hidayat

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1875

Authors

Nika Sintesa Grinika Politeknik LP3I Jakarta
Rais Hidayat Universitas Pakuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1875

Keywords:

Organizational Resilience, Vocation, Systematic Literature Review (SLR).

Abstract

This study aims to explore and identify factors that strengthen organizational resilience in vocational colleges using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach method based on the PRISMA model. This study was conducted on 25 scientific articles indexed by Scopus for the 2020-2025 period and selected based on relevant topic criteria. Data was collected from Harzing's Publish or Perish (PoP) application taken from Crossref and Google Scholar. The identification process uses keywords such as "Organizational resilience framework, performance strategy and organizational strategy. Based on the analysis of existing literature, organizational resilience in vocational higher education can be strengthened through several key elements, namely responsive and adaptive leadership, application of technology, social intelligence, internal and external cooperation, and organizational culture. This study also suggests that vocational colleges develop proactive, innovation-based, and diversified strategies in the face of rapid change. The contribution of this research is to develop an integrated model of organizational resilience for vocational colleges, which also serves as a strategic guide.

References

A. Mahmoudi, M. Abbasi, and X. Deng, “A novel project portfolio selection framework towards organizational resilience: Robust Ordinal Priority Approach,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 188, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116067.

Á. Serrano Sarmiento, R. Sanz Ponce, and A. González Bertolín, “Resilience and covid-19. An analysis in university students during confinement,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 11, no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090533.

B. Krsmanovic et al., “Ilmu Pengetahuan Keselamatan pandemi COVID-19 : Studi kasus kualitatif retrospektif di sebuah institusi pendidikan tinggi,” vol. 178, 2024.

B. Q. Hung, T. A. Hoa, T. T. Hoai, and N. P. Nguyen, “Resilience and Performance Among Vietnamese Business Organizations in Turbulent Environments: How Do Digitalized Management Accounting Systems and Organizational Mindfulness Matter?,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 3, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241271225.

C. Cheng and J. Zhao, “The impact of professional learning communities on pre-service teachers’ professional commitment,” Front Psychol, vol. 14, no. June, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153016.

E. Lawson, S. Bunney, S. Cotterill, R. Farmani, P. Melville-Shreeve, and D. Butler, “COVID-19 and the UK water sector: Exploring organizational responses through a resilience framework,” Water and Environment Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 161–171, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1111/wej.12737.

F. Bento, A. Giglio Bottino, F. Cerchiareto Pereira, J. Forastieri de Almeida, and F. Gomes Rodrigues, “Resilience in higher education: A complex perspective to lecturers’ adaptive processes in response to the covid-19 pandemic,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 11, no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090492.

H. Xia, M. Liu, P. Wang, and X. Tan, “Strategies to enhance the corporate innovation resilience in digital era: A cross-organizational collaboration perspective,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 20, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39132.

I. Georgescu, C. G. Bocean, A. A. Vărzaru, C. C. Rotea, M. G. Mangra, and G. I. Mangra, “Enhancing Organizational Resilience: The Transformative Influence of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Culture,” Sustainability (Switzerland) , vol. 16, no. 10, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16104315.

J. Zhu, J. Yao, and L. Zhang, “Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: the role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 657–671, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2.

M. Fastiggi, S. Meerow, and T. R. Miller, “Governing urban resilience: Organisational structures and coordination strategies in 20 North American city governments,” Urban Studies, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1262–1285, May 2021, doi: 10.1177/0042098020907277.

M. Herrero and S. Kraemer, “Beyond survival mode: Organizational resilience capabilities in nonprofit arts and culture fundraising during the Covid-19 pandemic,” Nonprofit Manag Leadersh, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 279–295, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1002/nml.21524.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” Syst Rev, vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.

M. Taneja, U. Tandon, and A. Mittal, “Exploring the intricacies of social intelligence, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational resilience: An empirical investigation,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 9, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100467.

N. Shaya, R. Abukhait, R. Madani, and M. N. Khattak, “Organizational Resilience of Higher Education Institutions: An Empirical Study during Covid-19 Pandemic,” Higher Education Policy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 529–555, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41307-022-00272-2.

Z. Zungu, S. Laryea, and R. Nkado, “A critical literature review on organizational resilience: why current frameworks are insufficient for contracting firms in the construction industry,” International Journal of Construction Management, 2025, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2025.2486649.