Penerapan Asas Lex Specialis dalam Kasus Penipuan Berbasis Manipulasi Bukti Transfer Digital
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4527Keywords:
Cybercrime, Digital Fraud, Electronic Evidence, Legal Certainty, Lex Specialis, Data Manipulation, ITE LawAbstract
This research examines the application of Article 35 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) in cases involving manipulated digital transfer receipts, as adjudicated in Decision Number 358/Pid.B/2023/PN Yogyakarta. The study is motivated by the increasing prevalence of cybercrimes involving falsified electronic data, while law enforcement practice remains inconsistent in determining whether the lex specialis provision under the ITE Law or the general fraud provision under Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) should apply. This research addresses two main issues: the analysis of criminal elements based on trial facts, and the application of electronic evidence as well as its implications for legal certainty in enforcing the ITE Law. A normative legal research method is employed, using statutory, case, and document approaches through examination of the court judgment. The results reveal that the elements of electronic data manipulation under Article 35 of the ITE Law were actually fulfilled, but the judges applied Article 378 KUHP by treating the falsified transfer receipt merely as an auxiliary tool rather than the core of the offense. This approach creates normative inconsistency and weakens the function of the ITE Law as lex specialis. The study concludes that the enforcement of the ITE Law in digital fraud cases has not been optimized, highlighting the need for standardized digital evidence examination and judicial guidelines to strengthen legal certainty.
References
Aji Wijaya, R., Aqila Abyano, R., Rizal Setiawan, M., Wicaksono, A., Sandiva, L., & Al Huda, M. (n.d.). Transformasi hukum di era digital: Menghadapi tantangan dan mencari solusi inovatif. Kultura. http://jurnal.kolibi.org/index.php/kultura
Akademia. (2024). Metode penelitian normatif: Analisis terhadap norma hukum. Jasa Konsultasi Skripsi Online. https://akademia.co.id/metode-penelitian-normatif/
Chandra, T., Munawar, A., & Aini, D. M. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap mekanisme penyelidikan pada tindak pidana penipuan melalui media transaksi elektronik oleh kepolisian dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(7). https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/
Hamzah, A. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Hendrawan, A. R., Dava, B., Ramadhan, A., Arif, B., Ahdar, H., Duta, U., & Surakarta, B. (2025). Perlindungan hukum bagi korban kejahatan digital dalam perspektif UU ITE dan KUHP. [Nama Jurnal], 14(12).
Idris, M., Aprita, S., & Nurlani, M. (2024). Pengaturan dan penegakan hukum kejahatan dunia maya (cyber crime): Harmonisasi revisi Undang-Undang ITE dan KUHP. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(3), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v6i3.4266
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Lokapala, Y. H., Nurfauzi, F. J., & Widowaty, Y. (2024). Aspek yuridis kejahatan phishing dalam ketentuan hukum di Indonesia. [Nama Jurnal], 5(1), 19–24.
Londok, J. (2025). Penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kejahatan penipuan online cyber crime di era digitalisasi. [Nama Jurnal], 13(4).
Miski, Y. R. A., Putra, S. M., Purwanto, M. I., & Luthfiyyah, S. (2025). Eksistensi tindak pidana penipuan (bedrog) dalam Pasal 378 KUHP di era digital. [Nama Jurnal], 10(2), 369–389.
Putra, N. B. A., & Sudj’ai, H. (2024). Analisis pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 yang diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam tindak pidana siber. [Nama Jurnal], 2, 161–167.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor 358/PID.B/2023/PN YYK.
Soecipto. (2022). Optimalisasi hukum siber (cyber law) dalam penanggulangan kejahatan penipuan melalui internet dalam menyelamatkan kehidupan masyarakat. [Nama Jurnal], 4(2).
Triputri, D. H., Mofea, S., Yulviani, D., & Pratama, R. (2023). Analisis yuridis terhadap penerapan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku penipuan dalam transaksi elektronik berdasarkan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali ditinjau dari KUHP dan UU ITE. [Nama Jurnal], 2, 42–51.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriel Regina Christian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












