Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Upaya Penanggulangan Promosi Judi Online di Instagram di Tinjau dari UU ITE
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4541Keywords:
Online Gambling, ITE Law, Digital PromotionAbstract
This study normatively examines Decision Number 509/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Srg of the Serang District Court in the context of eradicating online gambling in Indonesia, using normative legal research methods with a case approach and statute approach. The author analyzes the chronology of the case that began with public reports regarding the activities of online bookies, cumulative charges of Article 27 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law in conjunction with Article 303 of the Criminal Code, the prosecutor's demand for 5 years imprisonment and a fine of Rp. 500 million subsidiary to 6 months, as well as the judge's assessment of promotion via Instagram as the distribution of content that violates morality as proven by electronic evidence, IT expert witnesses, and billions of rupiah in transactions. The role of the government through the Presidential Decree Task Force No. 21/2024, the blocking of the Ministry of Communication and Information, and the synergy of the National Police have proven effective, although the challenges of overseas server jurisdiction and celebrity promotion still exist. The results demonstrate the fulfillment of all elements of a criminal offense (subject, subjective, objective, consequences, lex scripta), the legal certainty of the ITE Law, and a positive precedent for digital law enforcement. The conclusions affirm the success of the normative method in revealing the effectiveness of decisions, with recommendations for revising the ITE Law, training cyber judges, international collaboration, and preventive public education. This research contributes to the development of cybercriminal law doctrine in Indonesia.
References
Adisti, N. A., & Zuhir, M. A. (2024). Judge’s considerations in online gambling case decision. Jurnal Yudisial, 17(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy/v17i1.633
Adlina, N. A. (2025). Efektivitas penegakan hukum perjudian online di Indonesia: Mengatasi hambatan regulasi dan implementasi. Jurnal Hukum, 197–208.
Blokir konten judi. (n.d.). Kontan Nasional.
https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/kementerian-kominfo-sudah-blokir-425506-konten-judi-online
Fakultas Hukum. (2025). Tindak pidana kejahatan judi online yang melibatkan peran selebriti Instagram. Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 551–562.
Judol online melalui media. (2016). Jurnal Hukum Pidana, (19).
Magister Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam, & Fadhli, M. (2024). Indragiri Law Review. Indragiri Law Review, 2(2).
Miliar, D. R. (n.d.). Jerat hukum judi online penjara hingga. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, (2), 1–4.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2024). Keputusan Presiden Nomor 21 Tahun 2024 tentang Satuan Tugas Pemberantasan Perjudian Daring.
Putusan Instagram Nomor Pid.Sus/PN, & Viratama, R. A. (2022). Mengiklankan produk judi online pada media. Jurnal Hukum Siber, 2(1), 1469–1477.
Republik Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/332870/UU%20Nomor%201%20Tahun%202024.pdf
Siaran pers Kemenkominfo: Upaya pemerintah menghentikan judi online. (n.d.).
Terhadap pertanggungjawaban pidana studi perkara Nomor Pid.Sus/PN, & Sajidah, H. (2025). Situs judi online melalui Instagram. Jurnal Hukum Siber, 8.
Upaya-upaya pemerintah memberantas judi online. (n.d.).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Reyzha Afrinda Wulandari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












