Tanggung Jawab E-Commerce Terhadap Konsumen Serta Penerapan Choice of Law dan Jurisdiction Clause dalam Transaksi Lintas Negara: Penelitian

Yohanes Christopher June; Annisa Fitria

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4936

Authors

Yohanes Christopher June Universitas esa unggul Jakarta
Annisa Fitria Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4936

Keywords:

International E-Commerce, Choice Of Law, Jurisdiction Clause

Abstract

This research aims to examine the scope and limits of legal accountability of International e-commerce service providers towards customers in Indonesia, as well as the impact of legal and forum selection provisions in International transactions. Through a normative approach, examining the compatibility between domestic laws and regulations. For example, the Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019, which includes electronic standard agreements, especially those used by the Amazon platform, reveals that foreign platform providers have a legal obligation to ensure the reliability of their systems and provide accessible dispute resolution procedures. However, legal disparities were identified in Amazon’s standard contract, which unilaterally stipulates the law and jurisdiction of the United States. This provision has the potential to conflict with Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law. It was concluded that if the clause is not in line with national consumer protection principles, it can be considered legally invalid, and therefore, dispute resolution must refer to Indonesian jurisdiction. Therefore, provisions on choice of law and jurisdiction that conflict with the Consumer Protection Law and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 can be declared invalid. Thus, dispute resolution should be returned to the Indonesian legal mechanism and jurisdiction to ensure legal certainty and protect consumer rights.

References

Agung Abdul Rahman Wiyono, & Kurniawan, N. D. (2025). Tanggung jawab hukum dalam perdagangan e-commerce lintas negara. Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika (Armada), 5(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.59613/armada.v5i2.4992

Bentuk perlindungan konsumen dalam penyelesaian sengketa atas kerugian konsumen. (n.d.).

Berita Negara Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 50 Tahun 2020 tentang ketentuan perizinan usaha, periklanan, pembinaan, dan pengawasan pelaku usaha dalam perdagangan melalui sistem elektronik (PMSE). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/160273/permendag-no-50-tahun-2020

Dan, M., & Hak, K. (2014). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) (hlm. 1–549).

Heng, R. J., & Lie, G. (n.d.). Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi cross-border pada platform marketplace digital berdasarkan hukum positif Indonesia. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v12i10.2025

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/45288/uu-no-8-tahun-1999

Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/126143/pp-no-80-tahun-2019

Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Nusry, N. N. O. (n.d.).

Priyadi, A. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen dalam transaksi jual beli secara online. Wijayakusuma Law Review, 4(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.51921/wlr.v4i1.196

Rezkiyanti, T. (2025). Dialog legal. Jurisprudensi dan Tata Negara, 1(2), 89–98.

Stepanus Ndara, & Pidada, I. B. A. (2024). Kepastian hukum bagi konsumen dalam transaksi jual beli online. Hukum Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(4), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i4.652