Lecturers' Perceptions of Constructive Critical Thinking Learning in Academic Writing Courses (A Case Study at Makassar State University)

Penelitian

Authors

  • Muhammad Tahir Universtias Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1121

Keywords:

CCTL, Academic Writing, Lecturers' Perceptions

Abstract

This study investigated lecturers' perceptions and implementation of the Constructive Critical Thinking Learning (CCTL) model in academic writing courses at Makassar State University. The study's introduction highlighted the growing emphasis on critical thinking in Indonesian higher education and the challenges EFL students face in developing academic writing skills. The research aimed to explore lecturers' attitudes towards CCTL, identify perceived benefits and drawbacks, and offer recommendations for improved implementation. Employing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, the study collected qualitative data through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with lecturers and students, and document analysis. Results revealed generally positive lecturer perceptions of CCTL's effectiveness in fostering critical thinking, but also highlighted challenges such as time constraints and the need for more training and institutional support. Variations in CCTL implementation were observed, with some lecturers effectively integrating CCTL strategies while others relied on more traditional methods. The study concludes that while CCTL shows promise, its successful implementation requires addressing practical limitations through professional development and institutional support.

References

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Facione, P. A. (2000). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The California Academic Press.

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. (Note: This reference was added based on the discussion section, as it wasn't explicitly listed in the references)

Hyland, K. (2016). Academic writing. Routledge.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Lee, C. (2016). Challenges in implementing critical thinking in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(1), 1-10.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Dillon Beach, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Reid, J. M. (1993). Learning styles and strategies. Allyn and Bacon.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

08-06-2025

How to Cite

Muhammad Tahir. (2025). Lecturers’ Perceptions of Constructive Critical Thinking Learning in Academic Writing Courses (A Case Study at Makassar State University): Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), 3623–3629. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1121