The Language of Entitlement and Crisis of Legitimacy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesian Legislators’ Statements on Housing Allowance Controversy

Penelitian

Authors

  • Muhammad Tahir Universtias Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.2918

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Entitlement, Celebrity Politicians, Legitimacy, Housing Allowance

Abstract

In August 2025, Indonesia faced a legitimacy crisis after the House of Representatives (DPR) established a housing allowance of IDR 50 million per month for its members. Although billed as an administrative efficiency measure, this decision sparked controversy because legislators were deemed arrogant and impartial. This study used qualitative methods with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), combining Fairclough's model and Van Dijk's socio-cognitive framework. Five statements were analyzed: numerical normalization (Adies Kadir), legal legitimacy (Ahmad Sahroni), structural normalization (Nafa Urbach), minimization (Eko Patrio), and rights-based legitimacy (Uya Kuya). Data came from videos, national media, and social media content. Results showed all discourse strategies failed; statements were perceived as symbols of arrogance, greed, or incompetence. Career politicians were criticized for being technocratic and out of touch with the public, while celebrity politicians were mocked more for their entertainment credentials. The media labeled statements as arrogant or absurd, while memes amplified phrases such as "DPR's rights" and "IDR 2.5 million per day" as symbols of elite insensitivity. These findings confirm that discourse strategies inconsistent with public perception accelerate delegitimization.

References

Abidin, C. (2025). Celebrity politicians and digital populism in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Routledge.

Allen, M. (2023). Politics as fandom: Celebrity and populism in the digital age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Arias Álvarez, J. (2025). Graffiti and urban protest: Counter-discourse in Latin America. Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 12(2), 133–150.

Bates, T. (2023). Immigration rhetoric and the collapse of legitimation strategies. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 56–73.

Blom, L. (2024). Hostile appropriation of feminist slogans in political discourse. Feminist Media Studies, 24(3), 412–430.

Bozdağ, C. (2025). Populist discourses and online counter-narratives in Turkey. New Media & Society, 27(4), 789–806.

Brenner, N. (2024). Urban transformations and the politics of legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chiluwa, I. (2024). War rhetoric and resistance in Nigerian discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(2), 201–220.

Ćetković, M. (2024). Fortifying otherness: Political discourse and delegitimation in Montenegro. East European Politics, 40(1), 77–95.

Dalle-Nogare, L. (2024). Housing rhetoric and welfare struggles in Europe. Housing Studies, 39(5), 811–829.

Driskell, R. (2025). Celebrity politics and online hate in Vietnam and Malaysia. Asian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 99–117.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

Hansson, S. (2023). Legal legitimation in government discourse. Discourse & Communication, 17(1), 88–104.

Inwood, M., & Zappavigna, M. (2023). Celebrity identity and discursive co-construction in digital media. Discourse, Context & Media, 54, 100680.

Kamalova, N. (2023). Discourse and ideology in abortion debates. Critical Discourse Studies, 20(2), 145–162.

Kim, S. (2025). Media framing and protest legitimacy in South Korea’s candlelight movement. Asian Journal of Communication, 35(3), 221–238.

Kissas, A. (2024). Populism and digital outrage: Everyday politics online. Communication Theory, 34(2), 150–172.

Kompas. (2025). DPR housing allowance controversy. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.tv

Kranert, M. (2025). Discursive struggles over climate and net-zero policies. Environmental Communication, 19(1), 1–17.

Liu, Y. (2025). Discourses of overwork in China’s 996 culture. Language & Society, 54(2), 175–196.

Moffitt, B. (2024). Populism and the politics of anger. Political Studies Review, 22(1), 12–28.

Nartey, M. (2025). Activist discourse and government delegitimation in Ghana. Discourse & Society, 36(1), 101–118.

Nasyaya, D., et al. (2025). Celebrity politicians and vulnerability in Southeast Asia. Celebrity Studies, 16(2), 222–240.

Osisanwo, A. (2024). Militancy, discourse, and legitimation strategies. Discourse Studies, 26(4), 467–486.

Page, R. (2024). Dialogical reframing in government discourse online. Language & Communication, 92, 77–89.

Peterson, K. (2024). Celebrity politicians: Entertainment, governance, and populism. New York: Routledge.

Rahimi, B. (2024). The politics of delegitimization in media discourse. Media, Culture & Society, 46(3), 432–449.

Reuters. (2025). Indonesia’s parliament housing allowance protests. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com

Riedl, R. (2023). Social media and radicalization: Discursive practices online. Current Sociology, 71(5), 689–707.

Said, E. (2024). Legitimation and discourse in political authority. Journal of Language and Politics, 23(3), 344–362.

Schäfer, T. (2024). Normalization strategies in welfare discourse. Discourse & Society, 35(2), 145–162.

Scotti, F. (2024). Illiberal border discourses and the politics of entitlement. Global Society, 38(1), 67–85.

Strikovic, B. (2023). Populist appeals to “the people” in online discourse. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1400–1417.

Tempo. (2025). DPR allowance controversy sparks outrage. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co

The Guardian. (2025). Indonesia suspends legislators after housing allowance uproar. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com

“This is not a housing crisis.” (2025). Special issue. Housing, Theory and Society, 42(3).

Tzelgov, E. (2024). Twitter and the amplification of radical discourse. Social Media + Society, 10(2), 1–12.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Welker, C. (2025). Far-right narratives and geopolitical discourse. Discourse & Society, 36(2), 155–174.

Yasmin, F. (2024). Delegitimization strategies in India–Pakistan conflict discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(1), 98–115.

YouTube. (2025). DPR housing allowance interviews. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com

Zhang, W. (2024). Populist outrage and digital mobilization in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 17(2), 200–217.

Downloads

Published

29-09-2025

How to Cite

Muhammad Tahir. (2025). The Language of Entitlement and Crisis of Legitimacy: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesian Legislators’ Statements on Housing Allowance Controversy: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1), 6982–6994. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.2918