Analisis Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Perdata Terhadap Peredaran Produk Re-Branding di Indonesia: Penelitian

Windi Novita; Anna Triningsih

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4614

Authors

Windi Novita Universitas Esa Unggul
Anna Triningsih Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.4614

Keywords:

Marketplace, Legal Certainty, Product Re-Branding

Abstract

The rapid growth of marketplaces as part of electronic commerce in Indonesia has facilitated transactions while simultaneously increasing the circulation of illegal re-branding products that harm consumers. The unclear legal position and civil liability of marketplace operators raise issues of legal certainty, particularly when counterfeit or re-branding products are sold by third-party sellers through digital platforms. This study addresses two main issues: the legal regulation of marketplace operators’ civil liability for the circulation of re-branding products in Indonesia and the implementation of such liability in relation to consumer losses. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches, with specific reference to Decision Number 537/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt.Brt. The findings indicate that the regulation of marketplace civil liability remains fragmented and fails to explicitly define the obligations of marketplace operators in preventing and controlling the distribution of illegal re-branding products. In practice, the implementation of civil liability primarily targets sellers as direct perpetrators, while the role and negligence of marketplace operators in supervision and control are rarely addressed, resulting in ineffective consumer compensation mechanisms.

References

Djamaludin, S., & Fuad, F. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Marketpla-ce di Indonesia terkait Pelanggaran Hak Cipta : Tantangan, Regulasi, dan Upaya Pencegahan dalam Era E-Commerce. Unnes Law Review, 6(3), 7980–7992.

Dwi, K., Ratna, D., & Hapsari, I. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut Vicarious Liability Theory. 29(2), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art5

Giantama, A. N., & Kholil, M. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penyedia Platform Terhadap Barang Yang Melanggar Merek Dalam Marketplace. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40358

Harinie, Luwihono, Bayuningrat, Sakti, Arissaputra, E. al. (2024). Strategi Pengembangan Produk (M. Wardana (ed.)). CV. Intelektual Manifes Media. hal 94

Haris, A., & Yustitianingtyas, L. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Transaksi E-Commerce Pada Penjualan Barang Palsu. Jurnal Hukum Dan Tatanan Sosial, 3(2), 67–87.

Laritmas & Rosidi. (2024). Teori-teori negara Hukum. Prenada Media. hal 25.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (Tambra23 (ed.); 1st ed.). Kencana Prenada Grup.

Mordor Intelligence Research & Advisory. (2025). Indonesia E-Commerce Market Size & Share Analysis – Growth Trends & Forecasts (2025–2030). https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/indonesia-ecommerce-market

Octavira, N. (2024). Perlindungan Konsumen dan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Produk Rokok Elektrik: Implementasi UU no. 8 tahun 1999. Jurnal Literasi Indonesia, 1(3), 97–104.

Otovian, V. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Perdata Marketplace Terhadap Produk Ilegal Yang Dijual Oleh Penjual Pihak Ketiga. JUKAHU: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 1(1), 17–23. https://ejournal.nusantaraglobal.ac.id/index.php/jukahu/article/view/59

Pertiwi, P. (2022). Industri Produk Palsu Diprediksi Capai USD2,3 Triliun, Ini yang Perlu Dilakukan oleh Para Pelaku Bisnis.

https://www.integrityindonesia.com/id/blog/industri-produk-palsu-diprediksi-capai-usd23-triliun-ini-yang-perlu-dilakukan-oleh-para-pelaku-bisnis/

Putra, D., Sudjana, P., Effendi, D., Ali, C., Zakaria, F., Noor, A., & Anggraeni, E. N. (2026). Analisis Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Rumah Sakit terhadap Gugatan Malpraktik Medis Universitas Islam Bandung , Indonesia Satu contoh konkret ialah penelitian “ Juridical Analysis of Hospital Liability for Actions of Doctors Performing Med. 1971.

Rizky, M. (2025). Muncul Fenomena Barang Palsu Banjiri Ecommerce, Ribuan Orang RI Korban. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20250424155517-4-628483/muncul-fenomena-barang-palsu-banjiri-ecommerce-ribuan-orang-ri-korban

Rizqya, F. (2024). Pembelaan Diri Dalam Kondisi Darurat Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana (Kajian Putusan Nomor 373/Pid.B/2020/Pn Pdg). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Salsabila, N., Sahib, M., Idayanti, S., & Rahayu, K. (2023). Problematika Aturan Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik (PSE) Di Indonesia. Pancasakti Law Journal, 1, 61–74. https://plj.fh.upstegal.ac.id/index.php/plj/article/download/8/7/153

Sellercraft. (2025). Indonesia Digital Retail Outlook 2025–2026 | E-commerce, Consumer Trends & Market Insights. https://sellercraft.co/indonesia-digital-retail-outlook-2025-2026/#

Setiawan, J., & Afrita, I. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku Usaha Atas Produk Cacat Tersembunyi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, IX(1), 217–233.

Sumanti, J., Kalalo, M. E., & Mamengko, R. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pemakaian Merek Yang Memiliki Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Privatum, 10.

Vionita & Nasution. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Marketplace dalam menjamin Kesesuaian Produk yang Dijual olwh Merchant. Jurnal Hukum Modern, 07(3), 82–93.

Vitenka & Ni’ami. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Market Place Sebagai Platform Perdagangan Elektornik Terhadap Kerugian Pelanggan Akibat Maraknya Penjualan Barang Tidak Orisinil [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/113328/7/NASKAH PUBLIKASI.pdf

Winarsih, I., & Oktaviarni, F. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Penyedia Layanan Aplikasi Marketplace Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online di Provinsi Jambi. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 2(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v2i2.11322

Yetrin, M., Mewu, S., Julia, K., Studi, P., Hukum, I., Nasional, U. P., Denpasar, K., & Bali, P. (2023). Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Pembelian Produk Online : Analisis Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. 7(1), 441–450.