The Effect of Work-Life Integration and Quiet Quitting on Gen Z Employee Productivity: Sem Equation Model: Penelitian

Ida Farida; Djoko Wijono; Diana Anggraini Kusumawati; Mohammad Muslimin; Nersiwad Nersiwad

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v4i4.6249

Authors

Ida Farida STIE Trisakti
Djoko Wijono Universitas Proklamasi 45
Diana Anggraini Kusumawati Universitas Proklamasi 45
Mohammad Muslimin Universitas Islam Majapahit
Nersiwad Nersiwad Universitas Islam Majapahit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i4.6249

Keywords:

Work-Life Integration, Quiet Quitting, Gen Z Productivity, Structural Equation Modeling, Human Resource Management.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Integrasi Kerja-Kehidupan (Work-Life Integration/WLI) dan fenomena Pengunduran Diri Diam-diam (Quiet Quitting) terhadap produktivitas karyawan Generasi Z (Gen Z) menggunakan pendekatan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Di era digital yang mengaburkan batasan antara ruang profesional dan pribadi, Gen Z cenderung mengadopsi integrasi alih-alih keseimbangan konvensional. Namun, tekanan beban kerja yang konstan seringkali memicu pengunduran diri diam-diam, suatu kondisi di mana karyawan hanya bekerja sesuai dengan deskripsi pekerjaan minimum tanpa keterikatan emosional. Penelitian ini menggunakan data primer dari kuesioner yang dibagikan kepada karyawan Gen Z di berbagai sektor industri di Indonesia. Analisis SEM digunakan untuk menguji hubungan struktural antar variabel dan kekuatan efek jalur (path analysis). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Integrasi Kerja-Kehidupan memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap produktivitas jika didukung oleh otonomi kerja, sedangkan Pengunduran Diri Diam-diam memiliki korelasi negatif yang signifikan dengan kinerja jangka panjang dan inovasi individu. Temuan ini berkontribusi pada literatur manajemen sumber daya manusia tentang perilaku organisasi generasi terbaru di pasar tenaga kerja global.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.

Derks, D., van Duin, D., Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Smartphone use and work–home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee segmentation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 155–177.https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12083

Dwivedi, YK, et al. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and theoretical insights. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.

Feitosa, J., & Salas, E. (2021). Today's virtual teams: Adaptability is key. Strategic HR Review, 20(3), 85–87.https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-03-2021-0013

Formica, S., & Sfodera, F. (2022). The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting: A meaning of work perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103367.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103367

Hair, JF, Black, WC, Babin, BJ, & Anderson, RE (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Koopmans, L., et al. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856–866.https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763

Martela, M., & Pessi, A. B. (2018). Significant work is about self-realization and broader purpose: Defining the conceptual structure and curriculum of meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 363.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00363

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.