Penguatan AI Literacy dan Integritas Akademik Guru Melalui Workshop Etika Artificial Intelligence dan Pemanfaatan Notebooklm untuk Perancangan Materi Serta Asesmen Berbasis Sumber di SMAN 1 Cililin : Pengabdian

Edy Sofyan; Ernandia Pandikar; Ricky Ferari Valentino; Rina Marlina; Feniawati Darmana

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v5i1.7402

Authors

Edy Sofyan STKIP Pasundan
Ernandia Pandikar STKIP Pasundan
Ricky Ferari Valentino STKIP Pasundan
Rina Marlina STKIP Pasundan
Feniawati Darmana STKIP Pasundan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v5i1.7402

Keywords:

AI Literacy, etika Artificial Intelligence, NotebookLM, integritas akademik, pengabdian kepada masyarakat.

Abstract

Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) telah mengubah berbagai aspek pembelajaran, termasuk proses penyusunan materi ajar, asesmen, dan pengelolaan sumber belajar. Di sisi lain, pemanfaatan AI generatif juga memunculkan berbagai tantangan, seperti potensi hallucination, bias informasi, pelanggaran privasi data, serta menurunnya integritas akademik apabila digunakan tanpa pemahaman etika yang memadai. Kondisi tersebut menuntut peningkatan kompetensi guru agar mampu memanfaatkan AI secara produktif, kritis, dan bertanggung jawab. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat ini bertujuan memperkuat AI Literacy dan integritas akademik guru melalui workshop etika Artificial Intelligence serta pemanfaatan NotebookLM dalam perancangan materi dan asesmen berbasis sumber di SMAN 1 Cililin, Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Kegiatan dilaksanakan secara luring dengan pendekatan partisipatif yang meliputi penyampaian materi, demonstrasi, praktik langsung (hands-on), pendampingan penyusunan perangkat pembelajaran, serta evaluasi menggunakan pre-test dan post-test. Evaluasi dilakukan terhadap 39 guru menggunakan instrumen yang mengukur pemahaman mengenai etika AI, perlindungan data pribadi, transparansi penggunaan AI, identifikasi bias, serta pemanfaatan NotebookLM dalam pembelajaran. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar peserta mampu memahami prinsip-prinsip etika AI dan penggunaan NotebookLM sebagai source-grounded AI untuk menghasilkan materi pembelajaran yang lebih valid dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Tingkat pemahaman peserta terhadap setiap indikator berada pada kisaran 74,4% hingga 97,4%, dengan capaian tertinggi pada kemampuan mengidentifikasi penanganan bias AI (97,4%) dan perlindungan data pribadi dalam penggunaan AI (100%). Selain peningkatan pemahaman konseptual, guru juga berhasil menghasilkan rancangan materi ajar dan asesmen berbasis dokumen menggunakan NotebookLM. Kegiatan ini menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan yang mengintegrasikan literasi AI, etika akademik, dan pemanfaatan AI berbasis sumber mampu meningkatkan kompetensi profesional guru dalam mendukung transformasi digital pendidikan yang aman, etis, dan berkelanjutan

References

Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K–12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: A high-level academic and industry note. AI and Ethics, 2, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z

Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., & Çoban, M. (2025). Development and validation of teacher artificial intelligence competence self-efficacy scale. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6667–6685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13094-z

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Carter, L., Chowdhury, S., Crick, T., Cunningham, S. W., Davies, G. H., Davison, R. M., Dé, R., Dennehy, D., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Flavián, C., Gauld, R., Grover, V., Hu, M. C., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Junglas, I., Khorana, S., Kraus, S., Larsen, K. R., Latreille, P., Laumer, S., Malik, F. T., Mardani, A., Mariani, M., Mithas, S., Mogaji, E., Nord, J. H., O’Connor, S., Okumus, F., Pagani, M., Pandey, N., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I. O., Pathak, N., Pries-Heje, J., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Rehm, S. V., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Richter, A., Rowe, F., Sarker, S., Stahl, B. C., Tiwari, M. K., van der Aalst, W., Venkatesh, V., Viglia, G., Wade, M., Walton, P., Wirtz, J., & Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice, and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. E. J. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Hava, K., & Babayiğit, Ö. (2025). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ competencies in AI-TPACK and digital proficiency. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3491–3508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12939-x

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarok or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(5), 1095–1119. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2023-0099

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Lucas, M., Zhang, Y., Bem-haja, P., & Vicente, P. N. (2024). The interplay between teachers’ trust in artificial intelligence and digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22991–23010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12772-2

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Yim, I. H. Y., Qiao, M. S., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for technological pedagogical content knowledge. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel? ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Wang, N., & Lester, J. (2023). K–12 education in the age of AI: A call to action for K–12 AI literacy. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00358-x

Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., Foltýnek, T., Guerrero-Dib, J., Popoola, O., Šigut, P., & Waddington, L. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.

Referensi Nasional Pendukung Konteks PKM

Hartutik, H., Widodo, S., & Susilowati, E. (2025). IoT-AI mentoring and diffusion in the development of digital-based teaching devices for teachers. Jurnal Abdimas, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/3rhzkt80

Syahputra, F., Sabrina, E., Barus, A. P., Sebayang, E. A., Harahap, I. G., Ramadhani, P., Rahman, R. M. F., & Isnaini, R. (2025). Evaluasi efektivitas AI generatif dalam membantu guru menyusun materi pembelajaran di Indonesia. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i3.381

Referensi Syahputra et al. sangat strategis karena diterbitkan pada jurnal tujuan yang sama, yaitu JERKIN, dan membahas pemanfaatan AI generatif untuk membantu guru menyusun materi pembelajaran.