Design of an Online GWEP Test Application to Assess English Proficiency of Students at Horizon University Indonesia
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.470Keywords:
GWEP, EFSet, evaluasi bahasa Inggris, UI/UX, ujian daringAbstract
English proficiency is an essential skill in both academic and professional settings. To support this need, Horizon Indonesia University currently uses the EFSet as an evaluation tool in its Global Workplace English Program (GWEP). However, EFSet has several limitations, including inflexible navigation, fixed question formats, and less informative result reports. This study aims to design a more user-friendly UI/UX for the GWEP online test application that better meets the needs of both students and lecturers. The research applies a Design Thinking approach and uses a mixed-methods strategy (qualitative and quantitative) through surveys, interviews, observations, and prototype testing with Figma. The results show that the new application offers easier navigation, a “mark question” feature, and more detailed result reports. A total of 90% of users completed the test without issues and in less time compared to EFSet. This application is expected to serve as a more effective alternative for assessing English proficiency online.
References
Why is it important to learn English? | ETS Global.” Accessed: Apr. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.etsglobal.org/it/en/blog/news/importance-of-learning-english
“The Importance of Proficiency In English for Business Success,” https://ucedaenglishschool.com/, Accessed: Apr. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ucedaenglishschool.com/blog/why-learning-english-is-vital-for-success-at-the-workplace/
“English test with free certification | EF SET.” Accessed: Apr. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.efset.org/
“Understanding the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages | EF SET.” Accessed: Apr. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.efset.org/cefr/
G. J. Ockey and N. Gokturk, “Standardized Language Proficiency Tests in Higher Education,” pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_25-1.
T. K. Miya and I. Govender, “UX/UI design of online learning platforms and their impact on learning: A review,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 316–327, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.20525/IJRBS.V11I10.2236.
V. Kaushal, M. Najafi, and A. Entezarmahdi, “Testing, Analysis and Classification of No-Dig Manhole Rehabilitation Materials,” Frontiers in Water, vol. 3, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3389/FRWA.2021.713817.
M. Ishtiaq, “Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,” English Language Teaching, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 40, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.5539/ELT.V12N5P40.
C. J. Holt et al., “Evaluating and expanding usability and user satisfaction of an online research portal,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1–15, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.14742/AJET.8594.
R. Razzouk and V. Shute, “What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?,” Rev Educ Res, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330–348, 2012, doi: 10.3102/0034654312457429.
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
J. Rubin and D. Chisnell, “Handbook of Usability Testing Second Edition How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests”.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wafiqah Yasmin Azhar, Anwar Hilman, Arif Budimansyah Purba, Wahyudi, Vivi Ayu Lestari, Ahmad Najib Mutawally

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.