Rehumanisasi Sains dan Teknologi: Integrasi Kearifan Buddhis dan Stem di Era Industri 5.0 dan Society 5.0: Penelitian

Budiono; Julia Surya; Aleks Effendi; Eklianti; Leon Gilberto Medellin Lopez; Yaka Paweja

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.5090

Authors

Budiono STIAB SMARATUNGGA
Julia Surya STIAB SMARATUNGGA
Aleks Effendi STIAB SMARATUNGGA
Eklianti STIAB SMARATUNGGA
Leon Gilberto Medellin Lopez STIAB SMARATUNGGA
Yaka Paweja STIAB SMARATUNGGA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.5090

Keywords:

Rehumanization, Science And Technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Society 5.0, Buddhist Teachings

Abstract

The development of science and technology, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), in the era of Society 5.0 presents significant opportunities while simultaneously posing serious challenges in the form of increasing tendencies toward dehumanization. This article aims to examine how Buddhist teachings derived from thematic suttas can function as an ethical framework in the process of rehumanizing science and technology. The study employs a literature review method with a qualitative–philosophical approach to relevant Buddhist texts, combined with a critical analysis of contemporary discourses on AI and technology. The findings indicate that Buddhist values such as wisdom (paññā), loving-kindness (mettā) and compassion (karuṇā), as well as an orientation toward liberation from suffering (dukkha), can serve as an “ethical firewall” in the development and application of technology. The integration of Buddhist teachings is not intended to reject technological progress, but rather to guide it so that it remains aligned with human values and the well-being of all living beings. This article contributes to the growing discourse on spirituality-based technology ethics and offers an alternative perspective for more humanistic science education.

References

Aggarwal, D. (2024). IT Mindfulness : A Sensible Way to Use Technology. 6(1), 1–7.

Analayo, B. (2010). The Scope of Free Inquiry According to the Vīmaṃsaka Sutta and its Madhyama-āgama Parallel. Rivista di Studi Sudasiatici, 4, 7–20.

Angela1, S., & Surya, J. (2024). PENGENALAN MEDITASI PELANGI UNTUK ANAK-ANAK. 2(2), 11–20.

Bhikkhu, B. (2015). Aṅguttara Nikāya: Khotbah-Khotbah Numerikal Sang Buddha (DhammaCitta Press (ed.)). https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/analayo2010free-inquiry.pdf

Bodhi, B. (2022). A Look at the Kalama Sutta. BuddhaNet. https://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/buda-pdf/kalama1_l.pdf

BORDA, Z. (2024). Historical Evolution of Industrial Robotization : From the First Industrial Revolution to Industry 5 . 0 *. 2024(1), 4343024.

Chang, E. Y. (2023). CoCoMo : Computational Consciousness Modeling for Generative and Ethical AI. In Proceedings of ACM Conference (Conference’17) (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Association for Computing Machinery.

Dahlia, Suherman, & Partono. (2022). Hey Cortana Montrose TV PERAN KALYĀ Ṇ AMITTA DALAM MENANAMKAN DISIPLIN DAN. 08(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.53565/abip.v8i2.604

Deguchi, A., Kasahara, S., Kusumi, M., & Nakano, H. (2020). Society 5.0: A People-centric Super-smart Society.

Deroche, M.-H. (2022). Ethos of the Great Perfection: Continual Mindfulness According to Patrul’s Foundational Manual. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 29, 89–112. https://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/files/2022/05/JBE-29-Deroche.pdf

Digha Nikaya: Khotbah-khotbah Panjang Sang Buddha. 2009. Team giri Mangala Publication & Team DhammaCitta Press (Trans.). Jakarta: DhammaCitta Press.

FUKUYAMA, M. (2018). Realization of “Society5.0.” May, 0–11.

Gun, L. van der, & Guest, O. (2023). Artificial Intelligence : Panacea or Non-Intentional Dehumanisation ? 1–12.

Hazhiyah, A. U., Purnama, A. Y., & Latif, D. O. (2022). Analisis Numerik Perilaku Geser Sistem Sambungan pada Blok Batu Bangunan Bersejarah Shear Behavior of Heritage Building ’ s Stone Block Interconnection System using Three-Dimensional Numerical Analysis. 6(1), 1–10.

https://indonesia.un.org/en/sdgs

Ikram, L., Afaf, D., & Latifa, E. (2024). Beyond Industry 5.0: Tracing the Past, Present, and Future of Digital Industrial Transformations. https://doi.org/10.1109/iraset60544.2024.10548816

Ilmania, A. (2017). Geometri Fraktal dalam Etnomatematika Candi Borobudur. 1–5.

Khalid, J., & Mi, C. (2025). The Evolution of Industry 5.0 and Human–Machine Collaboration. 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83708-276-620251002

Kothari, S. (n.d.). Journey of Industrial Revolutions Till Industry 5.0: an Analytical Perspective. https://doi.org/10.52783/testmagzine.v83.14586

Lij, Lij. (2020). 6 Kualitas Yang Mengarah pada Ketidak-munduran. https://www.sasanasubhasita.org/berita-97-6-kualitas-yang-mengarah-pada-ketidakmunduran.html?module=serbaserbi

Mentari, S., Pramana, A. C., & Winarno, A. (2025). In the Age of Automation : Impact on Human Values , Ethics , and the Risk of Dehumanization. 08.

Mondal, D. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Integration in Teacher Professional Development : A Buddhist Education Perspective in Paschim. 5(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.53417/sjebs.v5i2.153

Munandar, A. A. (2018). Borobudur temple: the interchange of humanity values and ancient architecture development in southeast asia. 1(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/IRHS.V1I2.8

Nikishina, L. B. (2023). history of emergence , development , prospects of transformation into. 06023.

Ojha, S. (2024). A Transformative Exploration into Environmental Realization in Light of Early Buddhism and Bṛahdāranyaka Upanishad. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.24206

Oviatt, S. L. (2026). Technology as Infrastructure for Dehumanization :: Three Hundred Million People with the Same Face Technology as Infrastructure for Dehumanization : Three Hundred Million People with the Same Face. January. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3482855

Rojas, Narvaez C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese concept for a superintelligent society. Sustainability, 13(12), 6567.

Simonds, C. (2021). Buddhist Ethics as Moral Phenomenology: A Defense and Development of the Theory. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 28, 1–25. https://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/files/2021/12/JBE-28-Simonds.pdf

Situngkir, H. (2010). Borobudur was Built Algorithmically. 1–9.

Soguilon, W. K. (2025). Karunā and Caritas in Buddhist – Christian Traditions : Rereading the Ethics of Love as Self-Surrendering Love. 3(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.53417/jsb.174

Suargani, G., Surya, J., & Maullasari, S. (2023). Smart Techno Parenting for Early Childhood Socio- Emotional Development in the Digital Age Sekolah Islam Al Azhar Pati , Indonesia. 4(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.35719/gns.v4i2.116

Sucito, F., Kabri, & Andanti, M. F. (2024). Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Android pada Materi Etika dan Moralitas untuk Tingkat SMP. 5(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v5i1.16524

Sujarwanto, Eko. (2023). Prinsip Pendidikan STEM dalam Pembelajaran Sains. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual Volume 8 Nomor 2, Mei 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v8i2. 1258 Hal. 408-414

Sutrisno, A. (2018). Revolusi industri 4.0 dan berbagai implikasinya. 5, 5–7.

Tin, A. (2023). Buddhist Sustainable Education for Anti-Dogmatism in Myanmar with Special Reference to Kalama Sutta. Journal of Buddhist Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375866187_Buddhist_Sustainable_Education_for_Anti-Dogmatism_in_Myanmar_with_Special_Reference_to_Kalama_Sutta

Ubeysekara, A. (2020). Kalama Sutta: Lord Buddha’s Discourse to the Kalamas. https://drarisworld.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/kalama-sutta-lord-buddhas-discourse-to-the-kalamas.pdf

Utami, R. N. F., Muhtadi, D., Ratnaningsih, N., Sukirwan, S., & Hamid, H. (2020). Etnomatematika: Eksplorasi Candi Borobudur. 6(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.37058/JP3M.V6I1.1438

Varshney, A., Singhal, R., & Singhal, R. K. (2024). The Development of Manufacturing Industry Revolutions from 1.0 to 5.0. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i1.710

Venkatesh, S. (2023). The Arc of Industry 5.0 Bends Towards a Social Purpose. NHRD Network Journal, 16(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/26314541231160915

Wai, F. I. (2025). UPAYA MENGHADAP PEMBELAJARAN 4.0 DAN SOCIETY 5.0 PERSPEKTIF KI HADJAR DEWANTARA. Selidik (Jurnal Seputar Penelitian Pendidikan Keagamaan), 6(1), 53-66.

Walshe, M. (2017). Dīgha Nikāya. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0852-2_203

Yuniarto, B., & Yudha, R. P. (2021). Literasi digital sebagai penguatan pendidikan karakter menuju era society 5.0. Edueksos Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 10(2).

Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik indonesia: Hasil PISA dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11-19.