Pengembangan Instrument Test untuk Mengukur HOTS Siswa pada Materi Asam Basa: Penelitian

Lara Juni Ulpa; M. Naswir; Fuldiaratman

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1018

Authors

Lara Juni Ulpa Universitas Jambi
M. Naswir Universitas Jambi
Fuldiaratman Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1018

Keywords:

HOTS, Test Instrument, Acid Base, Differential Power, Difficulty Level

Abstract

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) are important competencies in 21st century learning, especially in chemistry that is conceptual and analytical. HOTS includes three levels of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy: analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5), and creating (C6), with creating as the highest level that demands creativity and original solutions. Acid-base material in grade XI is often considered abstract and difficult to understand, so an evaluation instrument is needed that can measure HOTS in a valid and reliable manner. This study aims to develop an electronic-based descriptive test instrument to measure students' HOTS. The development model is modified from the Wilson, Oriondo, and Antonio model, through three stages: design, limited testing, and measurement. The validation results by material experts (91%), construct (90%), and language (89%) show a very high category. The reliability test produced a coefficient of 0.87, indicating very good consistency. The discriminatory power of the questions is mostly good with a moderate level of difficulty. Teachers' assessment of the instrument's feasibility was 92%, and students' responses were 88%, both of which were categorized as very good. Thus, this instrument is suitable for measuring and improving students' HOTS in acid-base learning according to the Merdeka Curriculum.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3 (R. Damayanti (ed). Bumi Aksara, 3(2), 1–400. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Dasar_Dasar_Evaluasi_Pendidikan_Edisi_3/j5EmEAAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=komponen+sebuah+tes+terdiri+dari&pg=PA180&printsec=frontcover

Desiriah, E., & Setyarsih, W. (2021). Tinjauan Literatur Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Hots) Fisika Di Sma. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.4436

Fahrurrozi, M., & Rahmawati, S. N. L. (2021). Pengembangan Model Instrumen Evaluasi Menggunakan. JURNAL PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(1), 1–10.

Fitriani, L. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif HOTS pada Materi Kimia SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(2), 85–95.

Hamidah, M. H., & Wulandari, S. S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Hots Menggunakan Aplikasi “Quizizz.” Efisiensi : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 18(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v18i1.36997

Haryanto, Sanova, A., & Turnip, R. (2015). Analisis Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Ikatan Kimia di Kelas X SMAN 1 Muaro Jambi. 7, 45–50.

Istiyono, E., Setyawan, A., & Mardapi, D. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) Fisika untuk Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 12–24.

Khasanah, A. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Otentik Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Berpikir Kritis (Vol. 3, Issue 2). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Kurnia, L. D., Haryati, S., & Linda, R. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Higher Order Thinking Skills Menggunakan Quizizz Pada Materi Termokimia untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(1), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i1.21727

Lenaini, I. (2021). Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Purposive Dan Snowball Sampling. HISTORIS: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1), 33–39. http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/historis

Oriondo, L. L., & Antonio, E. P. (1998). Evaluating Educational Outcomes. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company.

Phafiandita, A. N., Permadani, A., Pradani, A. S., & Wahyudi, M. I. (2022). Urgensi Evaluasi Pembelajaran di Kelas. JIRA: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Akademik, 3(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.47387/jira.v3i2.262

Riandeni, A., Yulianti, D., & Distrik, I. W. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif Berbasis Student Active Learning untuk Meningkatkan Critical Thingking Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4720–4730. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971

Ropii, M., & Fahrurrozi, M. (2017). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. In Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wahab, G., & Rosnawati. (2021). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (Vol. 3, Issue April). http://repository.uindatokarama.ac.id/id/eprint/1405/1/TEORI-TEORI BELAJAR DAN PEMBELAJARAN.pdf