Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Jenis-Jenis Rangka Atap       : Penelitian

Widar Kristi Yanti Harefa; Envilwan Berkat Harefa; Aprianus Telaumbanua; Arisman Telaumbanua

doi:10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.2202

Authors

Widar Kristi Yanti Harefa Universitas Nias
Envilwan Berkat Harefa Universitas Nias
Aprianus Telaumbanua Universitas Nias
Arisman Telaumbanua Universitas Nias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.2202

Keywords:

Contextual Teaching and Learning;, Hasil Belajar;, Rangka Atap;, SMK

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model on students’ learning outcomes in the topic of Types of Roof Trusses at SMK Negeri 2 Gunungsitoli. The research background lies in the low student achievement scores, which were below the mastery criteria, and the learning process that was still dominated by lectures, making it less connected between theory and practice. This research employed an experimental method with a one-group pretest-posttest design. The instrument was validated using the Product Moment correlation and tested for reliability with Cronbach’s Alpha, both showing satisfactory results. Data analysis included prerequisite tests, correlation, simple linear regression, N-Gain analysis, and hypothesis testing. The findings revealed a significant improvement in learning outcomes after applying CTL, with a high level of effectiveness. CTL was proven to create contextual, interactive, and meaningful learning, fostering active student engagement and enhancing conceptual understanding. The results recommend CTL as an effective strategy for teaching technical subjects in vocational schools.

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole.

Andini, S. (2025). Membangun Jembatan Antara Teori dan Praktik: Pengalaman Magang Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa, 3(3), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.59837/jpmba.v3i3.2295

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bhure, M., Welu, F., See, S., & Ota, M. K. (2021). The Effort to Enhance Pupils Cognitive Learning Achievement Using Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i1.3

Fajri, R. M., & Suryanto, E. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK Negeri 2 Bojonegoro. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 6(2), 120–128.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (Ed. 9). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.

Karimudin. (2022). Statistika untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Kosassy, S. O., Gistituati, N., & Montesori, M. (2019). The Effect of Contextual Learning Approach (CTL) to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Organization and Management Subject. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.33

Kurniawan, A., Sudarso, E., & Hidayah, F. (2022). Pentingnya Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 14(1), 45–52.

McGahee, T. W., & Ball, J. (2009). How to Read and Really Use an Item Analysis. Nurse Educator, 34(4), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181aaba94

Mulyasa, E. (2019). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Putri, T. R., & Indarini, E. (2023). Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Berbantuan Media Konkrit untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(3), 1220–1227. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i3.5336

Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. (2025). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (14th ed.). Pearson.

Sugiyono. (2017). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Telaumbanua, A. (2022). Kontribusi Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Kelas X Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Konstruksi Kayu. Educativo: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 29–34.

Telaumbanua, A., & Telaumbanua, A. (2024). Pengaruh Soft Skill dan Hard Skill Mahasiswa terhadap Kesiapan Kerja di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan, 12(2), 126–136.

Telaumbanua, I. K., Harefa, E. B., & Telaumbanua, A. (2025). Pengaruh Model Contextual Teaching and Learning terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Materi Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 13(1).

Thamrin, L., Gustian, U., Suhardi, S., Zhongfulin, W., & Suryadi, D. (2024). Article Retracted Due to Manipulation by the Authors: The Implementation of Contextual Learning Strategies to Stimulate Students' Critical Thinking Skills. Retos, 53, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v53.102501

Widyaningrum, S., & Parmiti, D. P. (2024). Contextual Teaching and Learning-Based E-Worksheet on Science Subjects for Fourth Grade Elementary Schools. Mimbar Ilmu, 29(1), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v29i1.64644

Yudha, A., Sufianto, S., Damara, B. E. P., Taqwan, B., & Haji, S. (2019). The Impact of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Ability in Understanding Mathematical Concepts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.42