Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Vokasional di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK): Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Berbasis Evidence-Based Practices (2021–2025)

Authors

  • Aprianus Telaumbanua Universitas Nias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.5511

Keywords:

Educational Technology, Vocational Skills, Vocational High School, TVET, Evidence-Based Practices, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Digital transformation and the evolving demands of industry require Vocational High Schools to produce graduates who not only master specific technical skills, but are also adaptable to technological advancements, demonstrate procedural precision, and are capable of working within digitally driven systems. Educational technology is increasingly viewed as a strategic instrument for strengthening vocational learning; however, empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness remains fragmented and has not yet been systematically integrated. This article presents a systematic literature review of studies published between 2021 and 2025 on the role of educational technology in enhancing vocational skills in SMK and comparable TVET contexts. The review was conducted using an evidence-based practices (EBP) framework, with reporting guided by the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of the initial 405 publications identified, 196 articles were retained after the screening stage, 64 articles underwent full-text review, and 20 studies met the inclusion criteria for thematic analysis. The findings indicate that digital simulations, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mobile learning, and learning analytics significantly contribute to improvements in psychomotor and procedural skills, training efficiency, and learning motivation. However, the effectiveness of technology is highly dependent on its alignment with competency objectives, instructional design grounded in cognitive load management, and the use of valid performance-based assessments. This article proposes both a conceptual framework and an implementation framework to support SMK in integrating educational technology in a sustainable and evidence-based manner.

References

Akbar, M. (2025). The effectiveness of virtual reality and augmented reality in improving practical skills in vocational education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Humanities, 7(1), 45–60.

Aksoy, G. (2022). Augmented reality in vocational education: A systematic review of trends and learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11237–11266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11087-4

Alharbi, A. (2022). Extended reality (XR) in technical training: A review of effectiveness and design implications. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100070

Antonietti, C., Stefanini, A., & Marchetti, A. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in educational contexts? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266

Azevedo, J., & Marques, M. (2023). Mobile learning in TVET: Evidence and implementation challenges. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 15(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2023040101

Bakhtiari, S., Shamsi, P., & Tajalli, F. (2023). Digital simulation for skill acquisition in vocational training: A systematic review. Computers & Education Open, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100124

Billett, S. (2021). Integrating practice-based experiences into vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1844367

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2021). Mapping research in educational technology: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 162, 104091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104091

Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Chong, S. W., et al. (2024). A meta-systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Bödding, R., Uhlemann, T., & Richter, J. (2025). Mixed reality in vocational education and training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Virtual Reality, 29(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-025-01118-z

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Fang, J., Liu, Y., & Li, K. (2022). Virtual laboratories and simulation-based learning: Effects on procedural knowledge and skill transfer. Computers & Education, 186, 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104534

Garzón, J. (2022). AI in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100056

Garzón, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Systems, 9(8), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems9080084

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2021). Utilising learning analytics to support study success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-4

Kala, N. (2023). Cognitive load-based instructional design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8391

Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2022). Ethical challenges in learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 901–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13202

Lampropoulos, G., & Kinshuk. (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1691–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3

Liu, Y., Zhan, Q., & Zhao, W. (2023). VR/AR applications in vocational education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2263043

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. L. (2021). The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL). Educational Psychology Review, 33, 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

Martin, F., Lu, L., & Lam, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in K–12 education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction: Updated meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 171, 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104229

Munisamy, T., Shanmugam, S., & Kaur, S. (2025). Learning management systems in TVET: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12601-6

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., et al. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: A meta–meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329

OECD. (2021). The future of vocational education and training. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Ouyang, F., Jiao, P., & Scharber, C. (2024). AI-driven learning analytics in CSCL: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.107910

Ouwehand, K., Lespiau, F., Tricot, A., & Paas, F. (2025). Cognitive load theory: Emerging trends. Education Sciences, 15(4), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040458

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Papuraj, A., Gajendran, T., & Brewer, G. (2025). Digital technologies and employability in vocational education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1–28.

Rahmawati, A., Suryani, N., Akhyar, M., & Sukarmin, S. (2021). Vocational teachers’ perspective toward Technological Pedagogical Vocational Knowledge. Open Engineering, 11(1), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0040

Sailer, M., & Sailer, M. (2021). Gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09574-6

Setiyawan, A., Soeharto, S., Wijaya, T. T., Korenova, L., & Lavicza, Z. (2025). AI-TPACK in vocational education. Computers and Education Open, 9, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100319

Sghir, N., Adadi, A., & Lahmer, M. (2023). Predictive learning analytics: A decade review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 8299–8333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11536-0

Suhail, N., Bahroun, Z., & Ahmed, V. (2024). Augmented reality in engineering and vocational education. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 5, 1461145. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1461145

Tiwari, S., Shekhar, S., & Kumar, R. (2024). Augmented reality for procedural skill learning. Computers & Education, 201, 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104812

UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO strategy for TVET (2022–2029). UNESCO.

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2023). Biennial report 2022–2023: Enhancing digital transformation in TVET. UNESCO-UNEVOC.

World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Jobs. World Bank.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bond, M., Marín, V. I., & Gouverneur, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 18.

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2022). Educational technology and student learning. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221074882

Downloads

Published

13-02-2026

How to Cite

Telaumbanua, A. (2026). Peran Teknologi Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Vokasional di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK): Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Berbasis Evidence-Based Practices (2021–2025). Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(3), 20600–20612. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.5511

Most read articles by the same author(s)