Dampak Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa terhadap Ketimpangan Wilayah Pedesaan dan Perkotaan
Penelitian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3634Keywords:
Empowerment of Village, Rural and Urban CommunitiesAbstract
This study examines the extent to which the Village Community Empowerment Program (PPMD) impacts socio-economic inequality between rural and urban areas in Banjar Regency. Using a quantitative-qualitative approach, the study compares indicators of welfare, access to public services, economic participation, and social capital in villages receiving an empowerment intervention and their buffer urban areas. The analysis design involves Difference-in-Differences (DiD), propensity score matching (PSM), and social network analysis to capture direct, indirect, and spillover effects. The results are expected to provide policy evidence for the district government to design more equitable and effective empowerment interventions.
References
Bappenas. (2021). Laporan Pembangunan Desa dan Perkotaan Indonesia. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.
Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Blackwell Publishers.
Kusumastuti, S. (2018). Efektivitas program pemberdayaan masyarakat desa dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(2), 112–125.
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.
Nugroho, R., & Wicaksono, B. (2021). Implementasi sistem informasi desa dan dampaknya terhadap tata kelola desa. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Indonesia, 6(2), 145–160.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.
Prasetyo, A. (2019). Transparansi anggaran desa melalui digitalisasi informasi publik. Jurnal Politik dan Kebijakan Publik, 4(1), 50–66.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Rafidah. (2021). Dampak program pemberdayaan desa terhadap peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat di Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah, 9(1), 66–78.
Richardson, H. W. (1977). Regional growth theory. Macmillan.
Sari, R. D. (2019). Pengaruh pemberdayaan perempuan desa terhadap peningkatan pendapatan rumah tangga. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 27(2), 98–112.
Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 579–593.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2015). Economic development (12th ed.). Pearson.
Wahyudi, A. (2020). Evaluasi keberhasilan pemberdayaan berbasis KUBE di wilayah pedesaan Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial, 15(1), 77–92.
Wicaksono, A. (2021). Digital governance di tingkat desa: Pergeseran menuju evidence-based policy. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Nusantara, 10(1), 77–91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Devia Hetty Hernany, Khairullah Anshari, Amelia Puspita, Muhammad Haegel Rizfian, Nurul Syifa, Muhammad Rifqi Fadillah, Rosanda Nur Dwitara, Nur Ersanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
